Permits Filed for 218 Madison Avenue in Midtown, Manhattan

218 Madison Avenue in Midtown, Manhattan via Google Maps

Permits have been filed for a ten-story residential building at 218 Madison Avenue in Midtown, Manhattan. Located at the intersection of East 36th Street and Madison Avenue, the corner lot is in walking distance of Grand Central-42nd Street subway station, serviced by the S, 4, 5, 6, and 7 trains. Rybak Development is listed as the owner behind the applications.

The proposed 137-foot-tall development will yield 34,734 square feet designated for residential space. The building will have 26 residences, most likely condos based on the average unit scope of 1,336 square feet. The concrete-based structure will also have a cellar and penthouse.

IMC Architecture is listed as the architect of record.

Demolition permits were filed in May for the four-story structure on the site. An estimated completion date has not been announced.

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

.

27 Comments on "Permits Filed for 218 Madison Avenue in Midtown, Manhattan"

  1. David in Bushwick | June 24, 2024 at 11:53 am | Reply

    Unnecessary and a shame.

    • what’s so unnecessary about building more energy-efficient environment-friendly buildings?

    • there’s nothing historical or architectural value about the old blend building. No ornament at the top or entrance and that shows the lack of craftsmanship of the old building

    • Why a shame? It’s an undistinguished building and not a good economic use of a prominent corner property. It’s not like a landmark is being demolished.

      • “Unnecessary and a shame”

        Oh my god are you kidding me? As if the world will end and come together to mourn the loss of an insignificant aging structure…

      • demolish this building which should be landmarked to build condos for the super rich.
        Sad

        • stop trolling man lol landmarked for what? There’s nothing wrong with being super rich as far as they pay the tax

    • You will miss the cell phone repair store?

    • All the Robert Moses fanboys are piling on you here, but I agree with you

      The building is nice and the new one will not have a significant increase in unit count

      • ofc it’s you lowell. You comment on almost every single post that has demolition of an old building and lament that it’s a loss or not good. Do you even live in NYC? Even if the unit count or total sqft doesn’t increase, it might make economical or environmental sense and unless you’re willing to put your own money to save it for whatever reasons, your complaints are uncalled for

        • I live in NYC
          there is absolutely no reason why this beautiful building can’t be readapted into the new building instead of demolishing it.
          What a shame .
          another piece of NYC history demolished to build condos for the super rich.

          • …what history? being old doesn’t mean being beautiful, and readapting a historical building costs $$$$ to preserve the facade and then gut-renovate everything inside as it’s more expensive than just demolishing the whole thing and building a more energy-efficient building. Look at that old building – there’s nothing to preserve. No ornaments, no interesting details. So stop complaining on every single post that has demolition of an ugly building unless you can chip in $$$$ to make up for the difference in building cost or management

    • agree with you
      totally unnecessary
      just build on top of it

      • What kinda troll is arnelo/lowell. The building base might not be architecturally safe to build on top of, and it costs way more $$$$ to do so instead of demolishing.

  2. 10 floors, and just steps from Grand Central. Should be 50-70 floors. Stupid zoning.

  3. Knickerbocker | June 24, 2024 at 1:54 pm | Reply

    Once home to the cardinal of he New York Catholic Archdiocese, so of some note.

  4. It was the home of the archbishop of NYC in the 19th Century. Incidentally, former architect resident of 220 tried unsuccessfully to get the Morgan to purchase it and spruce it up.

  5. Maria Cartagena | June 29, 2024 at 9:02 am | Reply

    218 Madison Ave.nyc looking forward to the opportunity to obtain a apt.

  6. Should probably be taller. It will eventually be knocked down to make way for a super-tall skyscraper anyways. lol!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*