Why Brooklyn Needs the Utica Avenue Subway Extension

utica avenue subway extensionUtica Avenue Subway Extension, via OneNYC

The city has had grand plans to build a Utica Avenue subway line for nearly a century, and on Wednesday, Mayor de Blasio resurrected the idea of extending the 4 train out as far as Kings Plaza in Mill Basin, bringing trains to a transit-starved area of southeastern Brooklyn.

His newly released OneNYC plan [PDF] (renamed from Bloomberg’s “PlaNYC”) calls for a study to examine a possible extension down Utica, and says that the city “supports the full funding” of the MTA’s 2015-2019 capital plan. The new line would link up with the revamped Atlantic Avenue branch of the LIRR, which would run “subway-like” service and adopt subway fares, according to the report.

But the mayor and his deputies have yet to explain how they’re going to fill the $15 billion shortfall in the MTA’s current capital plan. And his administration has promised only $40 million for MTA projects—down from the city’s traditional $100 million contribution to the agency’s budget.

That conflict seems unlikely to change, especially after the mayor’s comments during his Hunts Point press conference on Wednesday, according to DNAinfo. “There is a reckoning that has to happen in terms of where we are going with the MTA,” he said, “and that’s going to involve the state, that’s going to involve us, that’s going to involve a lot of other partners in the region to make sense of it.”

However, OneNYC does reintroduce a more realistic solution to commuter woes in central Brooklyn: a new SBS bus route down Utica, supplementing regular B46 service between Bed Stuy and Kings Plaza. The B46 is the city’s second-most-crowded bus route, ferrying 50,000 people a day on a long haul trip that begins at Williamsburg Bridge Plaza and wends its way through Bed Stuy, Crown Heights, East Flatbush, Flatlands, and then finally down to Mill Basin and Marine Park. Supposedly, the MTA will launch SBS service this fall.

utica avenue extension vanshookenraggen

The potential Utica Avenue subway extension, via Vanshnookenraggen/Andrew Lynch

Most of these riders would take advantage of the Utica Avenue subway. Better transit would also bring more development to these low-density swaths of southern Brooklyn, which are some of the borough’s last affordable outposts beyond the “gentrifying fringe” of Crown Heights, Prospect Lefferts Gardens and Ditmas Park.

Property is certainly cheaper in these far-flung neighborhoods, making them attractive to both affordable housing developers and smaller market-rate builders. This little site on Church Avenue in East Flatbush, for example, is asking $80 per buildable square foot, and a much larger property near Kings Plaza in Mill Basin wants $1,950,000 for 25,526 buildable square feet, or $77 per buildable square foot.

And working class Brooklynites and new immigrants still look to these areas to rent one-bedrooms for $1,100 or two-bedrooms for $1,400. Over the last decade, most of the new arrivals in neighborhoods like Flatlands and East Flatbush come from Central and South America, South Asia and Mexico, according to Census data.

These neighborhoods have also seen 30 to 35% increases in people over 65—the city’s fastest growing population and one most in need of affordable housing.

Unfortunately, transit advocates and politicians alike are skeptical that the Utica Avenue line will ever materialize, between the MTA’s budget struggles and its inability to finish incredibly expensive projects like the Second Avenue subway or East Side Access.

“I’d like to talk about it more when the Second Avenue train is completed,” City Councilmember Jumaane Williams told the Times. “But I’m happy the mayor is talking about transportation issues in South Brooklyn, because too often it’s left out of the discussion.”

Subscribe to the YIMBY email newsletter and receive the latest new development news in your inbox.
Follow the YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

The Chatsworth Horizon
.

10 Comments on "Why Brooklyn Needs the Utica Avenue Subway Extension"

  1. Ichigo Makotto | April 25, 2015 at 5:39 pm |

    They can not even build the 2nd Avenue subway.
    How can we even talk about (or dream of) any other subway extension?

  2. I have lived in these communities all of my life. The last thing we need is a subway, we have lived this long without it we can remain without it. This is the best part about living in Mill Basin/Marine Park. No subway noise etc. I would leave this area if they extended the subway.

  3. Terry,

    I’m sure that most of your neighbors would disagree.

    I agree with NY Yimby that Utica Ave deserves an extension but I don’t see as many redevelopment opportunities as extending the SAS into the Bronx along Third Avenue. This section of Brooklyn is not conducive to as dense transportation oriented construction.

  4. Terry,

    Nice NIMBY-ism! That’s precisely what the city does not need when talking about the future, is people who have lived there “all their life” talking about “subway noise.” Get over yourself.

  5. Utica Ave certainly does deserve a subway line. The traffic condition have worsen over the past few years resulting in passangers having to take hours of commuting to and from work on a daily basis. East flatbush, Utica Ave, Mill basin ect. Is in dyer need of a subway line. Please construct it asap.

  6. I agree 3rd Avenue in the Bronx is very important, but Utica Avenue is much further from Subway access and Brooklyn does need it more than the Bronx. I just wish they can implement the second system instead, but it will take much longer to build. I will like it to be connected to the “L” line, which gives it somewhat of a shortcut to midtown Manhattan.

  7. I grew up here, and so am familiar from the 1950s and 1960s and 1970s with white people — then we were about 100% of the neighborhood — who didn’t want the subway extended because it would bring “the bad element.” The commenter here who laughably talked about “subway noise” (huh?) is just in the same backwards racist mentality I remember from my childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. I visit the old neighborhood frequently, and it is a better place now that is more diverse, with the white people there being more enlightened and less racist (otherwise they would move away). As the article said, this neighborhood has a large 65 and over population (I am in that group myself), and I would guess that some, but not the majority, are still the same old racists as the commenter here. I used to hear neighbors say, “They’ll build a subway here over my dead body.” Exactly.

  8. Sure we need the Subway for this area, why Manhattan get all the attentions, #7, #2……

  9. No, no, no! The last thing we need around here is a subway line! My husband and I moved to the area 6 years ago with our 2 young sons because we loved the quiet atmosphere and most all, the short walk to Marine Park. I could only imagine the hell that this subway line would cause and the traffic it would create for people trying to get to and from the Belt Parkway.

  10. Out source the project could save a lot of time and money.

Comments are closed.