Landmarks Approves Changes to Dime Savings Bank, Paving Way for Brooklyn’s Tallest Tower at 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension

Rendering of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension with the Dime Savings Bank at 9 DeKalb Avenue. Credit: SHoPRendering of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension with the Dime Savings Bank at 9 DeKalb Avenue. Credit: SHoP

The Landmarks Preservation Commission, on Tuesday, issued a decision that paves the way for construction of Brooklyn’s new tallest tower, which will be located at 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension, on the same block as Junior’s.

Existing conditions at Dime Savings Bank, 9 DeKalb Avenue

Existing conditions at Dime Savings Bank, 9 DeKalb Avenue

The commission approved changes to the former Dime Savings Bank, an individual and interior landmark at 9 DeKalb Avenue. It originally designed by Mowbray & Uffinger and built between 1906 and 1908. It was then expanded, though really rebuilt under a design by Halsey, McCormack & Helmer between 1931 and 1932. It received its landmark designations in 1994.

Rendering of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

Rendering of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

Now, JDS Development Group and the Chetrit Group want to build a 73-story, 1,066-foot-tall, SHoP Architects-designed mixed-use tower with nearly 500 rental apartments next door, which would be, by far, the tallest building in the county of Kings.

Existing conditions at Dime Savings Bank main banking hall, 9 DeKalb Avenue

Existing conditions at Dime Savings Bank main banking hall, 9 DeKalb Avenue

It’s an as-of-right project, but its base will both abut and connect to the former bank building, which will become retail space. That’s why the project had to go before the LPC.

Rendering of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension, showing the atrium that would connect to the banking hall at 9 DeKalb Avenue. Credit: SHoP

Rendering of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension, showing the atrium that would connect to the banking hall at 9 DeKalb Avenue. Credit: SHoP

Preservation consultant Bill Higgins of the firm Higgins Quasebarth & Partners opened the presentation with a little background on Flatbush Avenue Extension. The avenue was extended to allow direct access to the Manhattan Bridge, and that extension came in 1908, just as the bank opened, but that it left it “oddly concealed.” He said the site has a “complex history of multiple phases of construction.” He noted the copper-glazed attic and Guastavino tile dome.

Rendering of the former Dime Savings Bank at 9 DeKalb Avenue as seen from the atrium at 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

Rendering of the former Dime Savings Bank at 9 DeKalb Avenue as seen from the atrium at 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

Then Gregg Pasquarelli, partner at SHoP Architects, took over. The bank building is on a triangular lot, but uses a hexagon to resolve its space. His supertall will use hexagons to shape its setbacks, and you’ll always be able to see three faces. It will be more stone at the base and more metal at the top.

Rendering of the view from the Dime Savings Bank at 9 DeKalb Avenue looking to the atrium of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

Rendering of the view from the Dime Savings Bank at 9 DeKalb Avenue looking to the atrium of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

The bank modifications will include removal of some annex portions and ATM and teller build-outs at the main entrance and the addition of two entrances, one of them ADA, on Fleet Street. A one-story annex that faces Flatbush Avenue will also be removed. That will open up the space for construction of a glassy atrium (seen above) that will be part of the banking hall retail tenant (which has not yet been signed).

Rendering of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

Rendering of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

The project also includes restoration of the bank building. Richard Piper said the bulk of the work involves marble fracturing, copper repair, and window work.

Pasquarelli resumed presenting duties to discuss his further plans for the bank building, which included the removal of teller stations, which, while they are marble in front, are mostly 1970s Formica behind. The purpose of their removal would be for added retail space, though one bay would have been left in place.

Commissioner Frederick Bland, who said he never expected to still be living in Brooklyn when he moved there 44 years ago, spoke of the exciting changes the borough has undergone. He said the “exhilarating” project is an example of “enlightened urbanism at its best.” He said the presentation was “flawless.” However, without a tenant, he could not support the removal of the teller stations.

Rendering of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

Rendering of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

Commissioner Michael Goldblum agreed with Bland about the teller stations, and said the tower would be “compatible” with and “complementary” to the landmark. He said the proposal was “carefully considered.”

Rendering of the base of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

Rendering of the base of 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension. Credit: SHoP

Commissioner Diana Chapin said the proposed structure will be an “elegant and beautiful building” that is “respectful of the landmark.” She was okay with most of the changes, except the removal of the teller stations.

Commissioner Adi Shamir-Baron wasn’t about to vote down the project, but did say the tower is a “complete departure from the historic,” with the exception of its geometry.

LPC Chair Meenakshi Srinivasan noted that there are plenty of cases of small landmarks next to skyscrapers. She called the restoration plan “loving” and “caring” and called the overall proposal a “positive approach” that will enhance the landmark.

Christabel Gough of the Society for the Architecture of the City didn’t testify directly about the project, but mused on the boundaries of landmark sites. The Historic Districts Council’s Kelly Carroll did not testify against the proposed tower, but did take issue with some of the proposals involving the landmarked bank building.

“The designation report describes this landmark interior as a ‘large, uninterrupted banking room interior surmounted by a central skylight.’ HDC found it inappropriate, therefore, that the banking counters are treated as interruptions. These fixtures are made of marble and have ornate grillework–they are complete works of art in themselves and not made to be taken apart and assembled somewhere else. They should not be removed,” Carroll said.
“When this plan was designed, it was not viewed as losing one third of square footage to the counters as the applicant argues. If the floor area was indeed too small, it would have been designed as a larger space, but it wasn’t. What’s more, there will be a 1,066 foot tower using part of this landmark site to fulfill its design, so there is plenty of room in the tower for retail or any other of the applicant’s needs,” she continued. “Interior Landmarks enjoy the same protection as any other type of landmark, and they are rare, with only 117 in the entire city. Yet, here again is a proposal to destroy and remove designated, significant features. This is supposed to be an example of one of the most notable interiors of a bank in the City. How will it read that way if the things that made it a bank are discarded?”

The project has the support of Brooklyn Community Board 2.

The commissioners voted to approve the project, except for the removal of the teller stations. Once JDS signs a tenant for the retail space and assesses that tenant’s needs, it is invited to return and ask for removals as necessary.

View the presentation slides here:

9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_01 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_02 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_03 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_04 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_05 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_06 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_07 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_08 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_09 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_10 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_11 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_12 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_13 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_14 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_15 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_16 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_17 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_18 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_19 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_20 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_21 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_22 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_23 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_24 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_25 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_26 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_27 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_28 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_29 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_30 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_31 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_32 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_33 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_34 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_35 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_36 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_37 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_38 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_39 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_40 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_41 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_42 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_43 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_44 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_45 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_46 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_47 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_48 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_49 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_50 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_51 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_52 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_53 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_54 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_55 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_56 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_57 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_58 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_59 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_60 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_61 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_62 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_63 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_64 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_65 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_66 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_67 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_68 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_69 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_70 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_71 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_72 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_73 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_74 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_75 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_76 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_77 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_78 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_79 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_80 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_81 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_82 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_83 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_84 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_85 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_86 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_87 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_88 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_89 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_90 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_91 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_92 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_93 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_94 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_95 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_96 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_97 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_98 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_99 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_100 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_101 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_102 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_103 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_104 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_105 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_106 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_107 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_108 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_109 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_110 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_111 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_112 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_113 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_114 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_115 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_116 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_117 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_118 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_119 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_120 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_121 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_122 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_123 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_124 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_125 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_126 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_127 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_128 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_129 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_130 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_131 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_132 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_133 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_134 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_135 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_136 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_137 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_138 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_139 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_140 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_141 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_142 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_143 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_144 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_145 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_146 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_147 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_148 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_149 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_150 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_151 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_152 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_153 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_154 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_155 9DeKalbAvenue_20160419_156

.

1 Comment on "Landmarks Approves Changes to Dime Savings Bank, Paving Way for Brooklyn’s Tallest Tower at 340 Flatbush Avenue Extension"

  1. Tower standing to the sky with beautiful, new star light and stately for Brooklyn.

Comments are closed.