Landmarks Approves New Buildings at 21 West 17th Street and 16 West 18th Street

Proposal for 21 West 17th Street and 16 West 18th StreetProposal for 21 West 17th Street and 16 West 18th Street

It will be out with the old and in with the new in a historic part of Chelsea. On Tuesday, the Landmarks Preservation Commission approved demolition of the existing structures at 21 West 17th Street and 16 West 18th Street and the construction of new residential buildings to replace them. The site is between Fifth and Sixth Avenues in the Ladies’ Mile Historic District.

21 West 17th Street was once home to a four-story residential building built in 1850, which became a five-story commercial building. That was demolished in 1949 and a two-story office building was constructed in its place. In1999, a one-story addition was built, leaving us with the three-story building we have today.

Existing condition at 21 West 17th Street

Existing condition at 21 West 17th Street

16 West 18th Street was built as a two-story stable in 1867 and has remained that height, with the same window arrangement, ever since. Its appearance hasn’t been entirely unaltered, with multiple storefront reconfigurations and the loss of the cornice.

Existing condition at 16 West 18th Street

Existing condition at 16 West 18th Street

The proposal for their demolition and replacement comes from preservation architect Meisha Hunter of Li • Saltzman Architects and project architect Morris Adjmi, who is quite prolific in this part of the city.

It calls for a 13-story-tall building on 17th Street and a 10-story-tall building on 18th Street. Both facades will be very similar, with terra cotta and white inspired by the 1893 Columbian Exposition in Chicago. The 17th Street side will have a two-story base nine-story center section and two-story top. The 18th Street side will also have a two-story base, but will be followed by a seven-story center section and one-story top.

According to the latest building permits, the plan is for 12 units averaging over 1,863 square feet on the 17th Street and nine units averaging over 1,882 square feet on the 18th Street side.

Proposed 17th Street elevation

Proposed 17th Street elevation

Proposed 18th Street elevation

Proposed 18th Street elevation

The project also includes work on the base of the building located next door at 23-27 West 17th Street and 18-22 West 18th Street. The facades are already being restored, but commissioner-level approval is required for the work at the base. The 18th Street base will have very little work done, but the 17th Street base will see extensive work. Glass will replace an existing opaque section, and where mechanical equipment still needs to be covered, a sort-of shadowbox graphic will be created, based on items in the Met Costume Institute.

Proposed graphic at 23-27 West 17th Street

Proposed graphic at 23-27 West 17th Street

Commissioner Adi Shamir-Baron rhetorically wondered how many two- and three-story buildings must be kept to keep on what she called the “Adjmi Mile.” For the record, according to the design team, there are 18 other one- to three-story buildings still in the district.

LPC Chair Meenakshi Srinivasan noted that there are blocks in the district with both contributing and non-contributing buildings. She also asked herself, out loud, if any building designated as having an architectural style is protected from demolition. She answered no. Commissioner Kim Vauss echoed that, saying that just because a building is non-contextual doesn’t leave it open to demolition.

Commissioner Michael Goldblum mused about how to protect a historic district, but added that, “A historic district is not something that is frozen in amber.” He said he could support demolition.

“I’m really squirming on this one,” said Commissioner Frederick Bland. “By a whisper and a hair, I can support demolition.” However, if he didn’t have such a good design from someone like Adjmi, the decision would have been harder for him.

Indeed, it wasn’t an easy decision. “Demolitions in historic districts can be heart-wrenching,” said Srinivasan. “I see why it’s a struggle,” said Commissioner Wellington Chen.

Commissioner Michael Devonshire said he would look for every possible reason to not let these buildings be demolished, but said there was almost nothing historic left.

Commissioner Jeanne Lutfy agreed with her fellow commissioners that the buildings in question weren’t special.

As for the buildings’ proposed replacements, their design didn’t garner much comment from the commissioners because it wasn’t controversial for most of them. “I’m not in love,” said Commissioner John Gustafsson. Commissioner Michael Goldblum said that matching the cornice to each side’s neighbor was a mistake.

Roughly 15 people delivered testimony, most of them against the proposal. They were led off by Jack Taylor of the Drive to Protect the Ladies’ Mile. He stressed the structural stability of the existing buildings and their link to the historic Susquehanna Silk Mills. He noted that the LPC previously rejected demolition of one of the buildings.

Christabel Gough of the Society for the Architecture of the City said she appreciated Adjmi’s work, but called the presentation a “strange cocktail of technical terminology.” She could not support the project.

Neither could Kelly Carroll of the Historic Districts Council. “HDC would like to thank the applicants for making a courteous, special presentation to our organization and stakeholders. In general, we found the proposed new construction appealing and of quality materials. While sound arguments were presented for justification of demolishing these buildings, the resounding argument here is that these buildings were chosen by your Commission to be included in the historic district,” she said. “Even more, this Commission did not find it appropriate to demolish 16 West 18th Street in 2005 because of its contributing and irreplaceable fabric to this district. We are not arguing that these buildings are the highest or best examples of architecture, but their scale is represented by only 16 other buildings in the district.”

“There is a large swath of unprotected fabric not far in the Madison Square North area, which, after the community there was denied landmark status, is full of potential development sites that could produce such a building as the one proposed,” she added. “In general, there has been an increasing, predatory trend in historic districts citywide to identify low scale buildings and reinterpret their significance, which is not the best preservation practice.  In conclusion, in our role as New York’s only citywide advocate for historic neighborhoods, we cannot support this application.”

One man who helped with the New York City tree census and used that experience to back up his knowledge of the sites said the existing buildings “are small in height, but big in stature.”
“They are not stepchildren,” said a representative of the Flatiron Alliance. A representative of the Victorian Society said there has been an “alarming number of applications [for demolition or partial demolition in historic districts].”

In the end, the commission approved both the demolition and new construction at 21 West 17th Street and 16 West 18th Street and the restoration and renovation at 23-27 West 17th Street and 18-22 West 18th Street. On the former, Commissioner Gustafsson voted no.

View the presentation slides here:

16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_01 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_02 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_03 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_04 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_05 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_06 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_07 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_08 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_09 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_10 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_11 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_12 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_13 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_14 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_15 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_16 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_17 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_18 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_19 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_20 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_21 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_22 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_23 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_24 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_25 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_26 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_27 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_28 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_29 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_30 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_31 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_32 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_33 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_34 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_35 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_36 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_37 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_38 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_39 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_40 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_41 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_42 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_43 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_44 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_45 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_46 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_47 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_48 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_49 16West18thStreet_21West17thStreet_20160621_50

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

TFC Horizon