Second Try Nets Landmarks Win for New Mixed-Use Building at 466-468 Columbus Avenue, Upper West Side

Proposal for 466-468 Columbus AvenueProposal for 466-468 Columbus Avenue

An over century-old little building on the Upper West Side will officially bite the dust. On Tuesday, the Landmarks Preservation Commission approved the demolition of the three-story building at 466-468 Columbus Avenue, and the construction of a new mixed-use building in its place.

Existing conditions at 466-468 Columbus Avenue

Existing conditions at 466-468 Columbus Avenue

466-468 Columbus Avenue is on the west side of the street, between West 82nd And West 83rd Street, in the Upper West Side/Central Park West Historic District. The site was, from 1889 to 1893, occupied by St. Matthew’s Church. By 1898, a two-story commercial structure had been built. It was home to the Williams department store and an Associated Supermarket. The district was designated in 1990, and, in 2006, a third story was added. Recently, tenants included a vegan restaurant called Blossom and the Flywheel spinning chain.

In its place will rise a building developed by the Roe Corporation. Designed by BKSK Architects, it will rise eight stories and house both residential units and ground floor retail.

Previous proposal for 466-468 Columbus Avenue

Previous proposal for 466-468 Columbus Avenue

When the proposal was first presented in August, there were a couple of very big sticking points with the commissioners and the public – chiefly height and the treatment of the storefronts. With BKSK’s Harry Kendall and Todd Poisson having made modifications to the design, it can now go forward.

The building’s overall height has been reduced by two feet, three inches from 105 feet, seven inches to 103 feet, four inches. However, the height to the overhang at the penthouse terrace has actually been reduced by a full five feet. This has been achieved by reducing the upper floor heights.

Previous proposal and current proposal for 466-468 Columbus Avenue

Previous proposal and current proposal for 466-468 Columbus Avenue (see more side-by-sides below)

As for the storefronts, one of the criticisms in August was that the masonry did not extend down to the street level. Originally, they were to be treated in metal, glass, and granite. Now, they will be terra cotta. Also, the center bay will feature angled windows.

Moving back up the building, the subcornice has also been diminished and had corbelling added. This makes it look less like there are two cornices competing. Those would be the overhang and the subcornice.

The L-shaped building will still have balconies (which face south), but they been modified. Instead of one large opening with a sliding glass door, there will be two punched openings. Additionally, only five floors have those balconies, whereas there were previously six floors with balconies. The second floor will also not even have the punched openings.

The program could end up being the same – ground floor retail with residential units above, but the developer is now considering making both of the first two floors retail.

LPC Chair Meenakshi Srinivasan said the applicant had moved in the right direction, though there was room for more tweaking and the design was still “a little strained.” She suggested possibly reducing floor heights even more.

Commissioner Adi Shamir-Baron said she was fine with the height. She said the baguettes proposed throughout most of the building will be wild, perhaps too much, but she was still excited.

“I buy it,” said Commissioner Michael Goldblum. “The more frenzy, the better.”

“A glass box this is not,” said Commissioner Frederick Bland, who noted that many people are currently railing against the proliferation of glassy buildings. He did say it could come down another foot or two, but it wasn’t necessary. “[It] fits in very nicely,” he added. “A really exciting building.”

In the end, the commissioners approved the revised proposal, without modifications.

View the full presentation slides here:

466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_01 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_02 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_03 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_04 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_05 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_06 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_07 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_08 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_09 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_10 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_11 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_12 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_13 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_14 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_15 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_16 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_17 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_18 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_19 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_20 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_21 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_22 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_23 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_24 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_25 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_26 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_27 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_28 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_29 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_30 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_31 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_32 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_33 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_34 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_35 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_36 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_37 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_38 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_39 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_40 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_41 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_42 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_43 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_44 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_45 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_46 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_47 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_48 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_49 466-468ColumbusAvenue_20160906_50

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews

.

4 Comments on "Second Try Nets Landmarks Win for New Mixed-Use Building at 466-468 Columbus Avenue, Upper West Side"

  1. Currently proposed higher level on the top, much more than facade is the most interest point.

  2. Interesting detailing on the front. But each of those “slats” will provide a perfect roosting/nesting platform for our avian friends. Not a wise design choice IMO.

  3. @Carol

    Thought the same thing. Beautiful but impractical.

  4. Actually, neither beautiful nor practical. The plethora of projecting ‘brick slats’ illustrates just how deeply in the thrall of off-point formalism (“prairie house” meets “look Ma! No hands!”) those who produced this design are. The building will indeed become “pigeon central”, perhaps meriting being renamed The Rookery.

Comments are closed.