With Rooftop Pergola Gone, South Street Seaport Pier 17 Plan Sails Past Landmarks

Pier 17 roof without pergola (approved)Pier 17 roof without pergola (approved)

One of the most controversial developments in Lower Manhattan got a big thumbs up from the Landmarks Preservation Commission on Tuesday. The LPC approved the Howard Hughes Corporation plan for Pier 17 at the South Street Seaport, which includes demolition of the Link Building. A big point of contention when the plan was presented in August was a proposed rooftop pergola. With that removed, commission approval was a snap. Tuesday’s presentation also revealed some new renderings of the site.

Pier 17 roof with pergola (not approved)

Pier 17 roof with pergola (not approved)

The presentation on Tuesday was so succinct that architect Gregg Pasquarelli of SHoP and Hughes’ Chris Curry didn’t even need to address the commissioners after the project’s introduction by LPC staff. The new Pier 17 mall is the centerpiece of the Hughes plan for the Seaport. In fact, construction is already under way, with a design having been approved by the LPC in 2013. That did not include the proposed pergola or demolition of the Link Building, which is not historic and not considered as being contributing to the special character of the South Street Seaport Historic District. In the past year of hearings before Community Board 1, its committees, and the LPC, demolition of the Link Building has not been considered particularly controversial.

Members of the community feared that the pergola would mean even more concerts and other loud events that would disturb the neighborhood. They also decried how the new Pier 17 building would block the view of the Brooklyn Bridge. The LPC does not have the power to regulate use or viewsheds. Still, public opposition seemed too much for Hughes and the company dropped its plan for the pergola.

Rendering of Fulton Plaza access road.

Rendering of Fulton Plaza access road.

Another change from August is the access road, which essentially is an extension of Fulton Street and then wraps around in front of Pier 17. At that time, it was proposed to be asphalt. Now it will be precast concrete pavers.

The removal of the pergola (which comes with a reduced height for the screen around the rooftop mechanical equipment) and change in access road material delighted the commissioners. LPC Chair Meenakshi Srinivasan said the proposal had “come a long way” and called the new access road material “much more pedestrian.” Commissioner Frederick Bland joked that the people even looked happier in the after renderings (though they are, in fact, the exact same people).

This is not the end of controversy surrounding this project. Hughes wants a high-rise residential tower on the site of the New Market Building. Though it won’t go before the LPC (it sits outside the historic district), it is proposed to be 42-stories-tall, and that’s too much for the NIMBYs. Further aspects of the project that will go before the Landmarks Preservation Commission include the reconstruction (and relocation) of the Tin Building and a plan to put affordable housing on Schermerhorn Row, which currently houses the South Street Seaport Museum. Stay tuned.

Pier17_20151020_01 Pier17_20151020_02 Pier17_20151020_03 Pier17_20151020_04 Pier17_20151020_05 Pier17_20151020_06 Pier17_20151020_07 Pier17_20151020_08 Pier17_20151020_09 Pier17_20151020_10 Pier17_20151020_11 Pier17_20151020_12 Pier17_20151020_13 Pier17_20151020_14 Pier17_20151020_15 Pier17_20151020_16 Pier17_20151020_17 Pier17_20151020_18 Pier17_20151020_19 Pier17_20151020_20 Pier17_20151020_21 Pier17_20151020_22 Pier17_20151020_23 Pier17_20151020_24 Pier17_20151020_25 Pier17_20151020_26 Pier17_20151020_27 Pier17_20151020_28 Pier17_20151020_29 Pier17_20151020_30 Pier17_20151020_31 Pier17_20151020_32

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews


4 Comments on "With Rooftop Pergola Gone, South Street Seaport Pier 17 Plan Sails Past Landmarks"

  1. Sean Robertson | October 21, 2015 at 11:10 am |

    I think it’s pretty stupid that they killed the roof cover. Ugh, friggin NIMBYs.

  2. Richard Califano | October 21, 2015 at 12:10 pm |

    Very nice, and Yorkville gets a garbage dump!!

  3. Looks great .
    Didn’t they originally propose a marina there as well ?

  4. Pamela Dietrich | May 12, 2016 at 10:44 am |

    Looks better with the rooftop cover………

Comments are closed.