New Rendering Revealed as Silverback Development Acquires 24-16 Queens Plaza South in Long Island City for $80M

Updated Renderings of 24-16 Queens Plaza South - Woods Bagot

In a surprise announcement, Silverback Development has acquired development rights for a new, 23-story residential project that has already topped-out in Long Island City, Queens. Located at 24-16 Queens Plaza South, the property was previously owned by Greystone Development, who sold the building for approximately $80 million.

As part of the acquisition, Silverback Development will also convert interior layouts from rentals to condominiums. According to an official statement from the developer, the firm intends to capitalize on the announcement of Amazon HQ2 and the oversupply of rental properties in Long Island City.

“This project speaks to the demand for distinctive condominium buildings in neighborhoods like Long Island City, which has been overloaded with rental inventory in recent years,” said Josh Schuster, founder and managing principal, of Silverback Development. “We are proud to be entering the thriving Long Island City market and repositioning this important building to meet the demand that we know is coming with the exciting addition of Amazon HQ2.”

Woods Bagot, the project’s original architect of record, will oversee conversion of the property, which is already 60% complete under the initial scope of design. When complete, the conversion will yield 109 high-end condominium residences, slightly fewer than the 117 rental properties originally planned. The new condos will range from studios up to two-bedroom accommodations.

The amenity package, completion date, and remaining duration of construction have not been confirmed since the acquisition was announced this week.

Subscribe to YIMBY’s daily e-mail

Follow YIMBYgram for real-time photo updates
Like YIMBY on Facebook
Follow YIMBY’s Twitter for the latest in YIMBYnews


4 Comments on "New Rendering Revealed as Silverback Development Acquires 24-16 Queens Plaza South in Long Island City for $80M"

  1. Please pardon me for using your space: Penetrated me by facade and corner on design to the development, also air penetrable when people live there. (Thank you)

  2. Bad, dated 60’s retro ‘graphic design’ applied in the manner of Detroit as surface ‘styling’ to this unfortunate building proposal. Pure un-architectural schlock. Dramamine required to even contemplate this ‘elevation’.

    • ‘Un-architectural”, “schlock”, “dated”, “Detrot-mannered” , “unfortunate”, “retro”, “unfortunate” and that most damning of all adjectives:“bad”!
      My, my, my you certainly have a way with words (and a thesaurus)
      –but not necessarily a way with astute or accurate observations. & “contemplations”.
      Something tells me you don’t quite appreciate that this building is a refreshing departure from Long Island City’s boring box-like cookie-cutter rows of glass-enclosed behemoths. Watch it with that Dramamine!

  3. Would agree that this is on the schlock scale. This look-at-me building tries to hard and ends up being somewhat cartoonish. It could be toned down and would have the potential to be an elegant, landmark-quality enduring design. This looks like Queens sloppily trying to do Brooklyn, Chelsea, San Francisco quality — and it doesn’t work. Back to the drawing board .’ Consider the skin materials, transition from base building, and the degree of swerviness. More restraint wil result in a fine playful building without being a cartoon.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.